A draft manual about making manuals…

We recently received an email requesting advice on how to make a users manual for the re-enactment of a historical artwork.

here are a few notes:

We have a few academic papers:

this is from before we made the user manual for horror film 1:

Performance Matters Journal: Re-enactment of Malcolm Le Grice’s “Horror Film 1”

This is more recent and explicitly discusses the HF1 user manual (briefly)

Re-enactment, Users Manuals and DNA Storage: methods for media art preservation

recent blog post about the HF1 manual

Horror Film 1 – Users Manual (version 1.0)

you can also see our 2009 user manual for (wo)Man With Mirror

(Wo)man with Mirror

louise’s phd thesis (see chapter 4 on user manuals)
https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/en/publications/tending-the-archive-how-re-use-of-ephemeral-artworks-contributes-

some key ideas:

  • building trust through socialising with the artist
  • oral history interviews
  • explicit learning about choreography and technical things
  • research on / with the artist in archives if available
  • trying out the re-enactment for ourselves
  • checking back with the artist to fill in gaps
  • writing a manual FOR OURSELVES so we remember what we did (make it easier next time)
  • writing a manual with the view to pass it on to someone else (technical stuff, contextual stuff, and stuff about the ‘spirit of the work’
  • trying the draft manual out with someone else
  • noting what needs changing based on that
  • make the changes that need to be made
  • when another person tries it out, documenting their attempt and including it in the next iteration of the user manual
    etc (ad infinitum, never finished…)

Louise adds:

I used the insights Lucas and I have gained to work with an Australian artist to do something just like you’re planning – to make a manual herself. I wrote a blog post about that:
https://nga.gov.au/stories-ideas/manual-making-for-ephemeral-art/

I think the keys are:

  • you need to observe yourself making the work and keep notes about that. That’s what becomes the manual.
  • You need to try to be ‘true’ to the work, that’s your job.
  • You need to find your way to capture your observations that make sense to you as a record of that experience.
  • As Lucas says ‘writing a manual FOR OURSELVES so we remember what we did (make it easier next time)’.
  • For me, the letter (or some communication) to a future user from the original artist is crucial, a key finding in my PhD is that without that permission, people feel awkward to just go ahead and use the manual.
  • We’re still working on a way to really make it do the ‘ad infinitum’ bit, ie to get users to make a contribution back to the manual, that’s what really strengthens it.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *